describe how the milky way's light output compares with those of the most luminous galaxies in the blue cloud, based on the information in

Answer:

The wavelength of the wave would increase to 10 meters.

Explanation:

We can use the formula:

velocity = frequency × wavelength

to relate the velocity, frequency, and wavelength of a wave.

Given that the wave has a speed of 20 m/s and a wavelength of 5 meters, we can solve for its frequency as follows:

frequency = velocity ÷ wavelength = 20 m/s ÷ 5 meters = 4 Hz

Now, if the same wave is created in the same medium, but with half the original frequency, its new frequency will be:

new frequency = 4 Hz ÷ 2 = 2 Hz

To find the new wavelength of the wave, we can rearrange the formula above to solve for wavelength:

wavelength = velocity ÷ frequency

Using the new frequency of 2 Hz, we get:

new wavelength = 20 m/s ÷ 2 Hz = 10 meters

Therefore, if the same wave was created in the same medium, with half the original frequency, the wavelength of the wave would increase to 10 meters.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

The terminal velocity of the skydiver is given by v = mg/b. For x < 0, there is no magnetic field, so the induced emf (ε) is also zero.

Part A:

At terminal velocity, the net force on the skydiver is zero. So we can write the equation as:

Fg + Fd = 0

mg - bv = 0

Rearranging the equation, we get:

bv = mg

Dividing both sides by b, we have:

v = mg/b

Part B:

In this case, the magnetic field (B) is constant for x > 0 and zero for x < 0. The area of the loop (A) is given by L², where L is the side length of the square loop.

The induced emf (ε) is therefore given by:

ε = -dΦ/dt

A magnetic field is a region in space where magnetic forces are experienced. It is generated by moving electric charges or by the intrinsic magnetic properties of certain materials. The magnetic field is characterized by both its strength and direction. The strength of a magnetic field is typically measured in units of teslas (T) or gauss (G), and it determines the intensity of the magnetic forces experienced by charged particles or magnetic materials within the field.

The direction of the magnetic field is indicated by imaginary lines known as magnetic field lines, which form closed loops around the magnetic source. These lines help visualize the direction of the magnetic field and indicate the path a magnetic object would take if placed within the field.

To know more about Magnetic field refer to-

brainly.com/question/14848188

#SPJ4

Answer:

Digesting a salad

Explanation:

All the other ones are physical changes because you're changing its form but not its chemical identity and not changing the substance. Digesting a salad is a chemical change because you're both changing its form AND its chemical identity

Answer:

The correct option is the third option

Explanation:

Firstly, it must be noted that chemicals/reagents that are sensitive to sunlight are stored in dark/amber container in the laboratory. Hence, the chloroform can only be found in an amber/dark bottle.

Also, reagents/chemicals that release poisonous/offensive gases are handled in the fume cupboard in the laboratory. Thus, If Malik is going to pour the chloroform, he should pour it in a fume cupboard to avoid inhaling it because of the toxicity of it's vapor.

From the above explanation, it can be deduced that Malik should locate the chloroform stored in a dark container in chemical storage and should take it to the fume hood to pour.

Answer:

He should locate the chloroform stored in a dark container in chemical storage and should take it to the fume hood to pour.

Explanation:

Answer:

well they make the siren go beacaus eyou are doing somthing wrong so what were you thinking

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it might be A: Alec but tell me if I'm wrong

Explanation:

Answer:

a

Explanation:

i did it on e d g e n u i t y

Answer:

i think its the doldrums

Explanation:

The ITCZ straddles the Equator. In fact, the low-pressure doldrums are created as the sun heats the equatorial region and causes air masses to rise and travel north and south. (This warm, low-pressure equatorial wind descends again around the horse latitudes. hoped i helped u! <3 :)

Wringing of the hands is a physical gesture where you rub or squeeze your hands together in a state of distress, anxiety, or uncertainty.

Wringing of the hands is a physical manifestation of one's inner emotional state, and it can be a powerful indicator of a person's mental and emotional well-being.

It is a common nonverbal communication that often conveys nervousness, worry, or even guilt. This gesture is usually accompanied by other body language cues such as fidgeting, pacing, or avoiding eye contact.

Wringing of the hands can be a sign of emotional turmoil or intense stress, and it may be an attempt to release tension or to calm oneself down. It is often seen in situations of uncertainty or anxiety, such as before an important presentation or during a high-pressure meeting. It can also be a sign of remorse or guilt, especially when someone is trying to apologize or confess to wrongdoing.

Learn more about hands here:

https://brainly.com/question/30248193

#SPJ4

Answer:Δx=v0t + 1/2 at 2

Answer:

I know I'm late but...

Explanation:

A mixture is the combination of two or more substances together. And I'm pretty sure that a mixture has no chemical substances. And mixtures can be physically separated.

Hope this helps you!

Stay safe and have a wonderful day/night!! :)

Please give brainliest to the person above!!!!!

══════════XXX═════════════

\(\huge\boxed{\fcolorbox{black}{yellow}{HOPE\: IT \: HELPS}}\)

HOPE IT HELPS

\(\begin{gathered}\begin{gathered}\\\huge\underline{ \mathbb\blue{Please}\:\mathbb\green{Mark}\:\mathbb\orange{As}}\:\end{gathered}\end{gathered}\)

Please Mark As

\(\huge\underline{ \mathbb\red{Brilliant}\:\mathbb\purple{Answers}}\)

Brilliant Answers

Slab A has the larger index of refraction as indicated by the smaller angle of refraction in Slab B.

The index of refraction is a property of a material that describes how much the material can bend light as it passes through it. When light travels from one medium to another, such as from air to a glass slab, its speed and direction change due to the change in the refractive index of the materials involved.

In this scenario, both slabs are made from different types of glass, and a ray of light enters each slab at the same angle of incidence. The angle of refraction, which is the angle at which the light ray changes direction upon entering the slab, is smaller in Slab B compared to Slab A. This difference in the angle of refraction indicates that Slab A has the larger index of refraction. According to Snell's law, the angle of refraction is inversely proportional to the index of refraction of the material. When the angle of refraction is smaller, it implies that the index of refraction is larger. Therefore, Slab A has the greater index of refraction compared to Slab B.

Learn more about Refraction here: https://brainly.com/question/32038813

#SPJ11

The correct answer is 1 cm. the spring will stretch when it supports a mass of 10 Kg.

What is Hooke’s Law?

According to Robert Hooke, an English scientist, for relatively minor deformations of an item, the displacement or amount of the deformation is directly proportional to the deforming force or load.

Hooke aimed to show how a spring's elasticity and the forces acting on it are related. According to Hooke's Law, a spring's extension is proportional to the load placed on it. As long as the load does not exceed the material's elastic limit, a variety of materials will adhere to this rule.

From Given data,

For each Kilogram, spring stretched 0.89 / 8.4 = 0.1 cm

Then from Hooke’s law we can conclude

0.1cm x 10 Kg = 1 cm. the spring will stretch

To learn more about Hooke’s law for string stretch from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/14477435

#SPJ4

Answer:

1 & 2

Explanation:

Answer:

Z=49,A=113

N=64,Z=49

Explanation:

Answer:

Unbalanced forces cause acceleration.

Explanation:

They cause acceleration because one force is less or more in Newtons than the other force.

For example, let's say we have a cardboard box on the floor with no friction.

If one force is pushing the box to the right with 50 Newtons, and the second force is pushing the box to the left with 0 Newtons, the box would accelerate to the RIGHT because the forces are UNBALANCED.

The roof of the Hearst Tower is designed to collect rainwater for several reasons, including sustainability and environmental considerations.

Here's an explanation of why rainwater collection is incorporated into the design:
1. To reduce stormwater runoff: By collecting rainwater, the roof helps prevent excess water from overwhelming the city's sewer system and contributing to flooding.
2. To conserve water resources: The collected rainwater can be used for various purposes within the building, such as irrigation, flushing toilets, or cooling systems, reducing the demand for freshwater resources.
3. To promote sustainable architecture: The Hearst Tower is designed with environmental sustainability in mind, and rainwater collection is one of the many green features incorporated into its design.

In summary, the roof of the Hearst Tower is designed to collect rainwater to reduce stormwater runoff, conserve water resources, and promote sustainable architecture.

Learn more about Hearst Tower at https://brainly.com/question/28907695

#SPJ11

Eliminate b by combining b + a and b - a, and solve for a :

(b + a) - (b - a) = (5i - j) - (i - 7j)

2a = 4i + 6j

a = 2i + 3j

Now compute the magnitude and direction.

mag: ||a|| = √(2² + 3²) = √13

dir: tan(θ) = 3/2   ⇒   θ = arctan(3/2) ≈ 56.3°

25 million micrometeorites hit the surface of the moon daily. The Apollo astronauts' footprint will stay on the surface of the moon if it takes around 20 micrometeorites to damage it.

So, to calculate the duration, we'll need to find the number of footprints that have been damaged. We don't know how many footprints there are, so let's estimate that. Assume the average person walks at a rate of 1 step per second. Assume that each step is one foot in length. Assume the average person walks for 2 hours. Then, each person walks for 7200 seconds. The number of footprints per individual is 7200 x 1 = 7200. If we presume 12 people in total, the total number of footprints is 7200 x 12 = 86400.

Therefore, assuming that the footprints are uniformly distributed on the surface of the moon and that 25 million micrometeorites hit the moon's surface daily, the footprints are destroyed at a rate of 25,000,000/20 = 1,250,000 footprints per day.

The duration for the Apollo astronaut's footprints on the moon to remain intact:86400/1,250,000 = 0.06912 days, or roughly 1 hour and 40 minutes.

To calculate how long an Apollo astronaut's footprint would stay on the surface of the Moon, given that it takes around 20 micrometeorites to destroy a footprint, and given that 25 million micrometeorites hit the Moon's surface every day, we'll need to do some calculations. We'll begin by assuming that the footprints were uniformly distributed on the surface of the moon. We'll also assume that each person took 1 step per second, that each step is one foot in length, and that the average person walked for 2 hours. That means each person walked for 7200 seconds, or took 7200 steps. If we assume that there were 12 people on the Apollo mission, then the total number of footprints left by the astronauts would be 12 x 7200 = 86400.

Now, we need to figure out how quickly these footprints are being destroyed. Given that it takes around 20 micrometeorites to destroy a footprint, and given that 25 million micrometeorites hit the Moon's surface every day, we can calculate that the footprints are being destroyed at a rate of 25,000,000/20 = 1,250,000 footprints per day.

So, to find out how long it would take for the footprints to be destroyed, we divide the total number of footprints by the rate at which they are being destroyed:86400/1,250,000 = 0.06912 days, or roughly 1 hour and 40 minutes. Therefore, the length of time for the footprint to remain intact is approximately 1 hour and 40 minutes.

Learn more about micrometeorites: https://brainly.com/question/10979949

#SPJ11

Option (D) is the correct answer

Given data:  width of each slit, a = 0.80 mm.        

distance between the slits, d = 2.6 mm

If the wavelength of light is \lambda then,

2.6 ) = 2 x (0.8) = 6.5 r=2x

x = 7 ( taking the next higher integer of 6.5)

The wavelength of a wave describes how lengthy the wave is. The distance from the "crest" (top) of 1 wave to the crest of the following wave is the wavelength.

Alternately, we can degree from the "trough" (bottom) of 1 wave to the trough of the subsequent wave and get the equal price for the wavelength.

SI unit of wavelength is metre . At the same time as measuring wavelength the multiples or fractions of a metre is also used. Extensively, exponential powers of 10 are used whilst wavelengths are of a huge assets.

Learn more about Wavelength here:- https://brainly.com/question/10728818

#SPJ4

No, the sun cannot explain global warming. Global warming is a phenomenon in which the temperature of the Earth's surface and atmosphere is rising continuously due to human activities such as deforestation, burning of fossil fuels, and industrialization.

This increase in temperature cannot be explained only by an increase in solar radiation.There are several factors which contribute to global warming, including greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and water vapor. These gases trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere, which causes the planet's temperature to rise. The sun's radiation does contribute to global warming, but it is not the main cause.

i) To calculate the increase in solar radiation that would cause the Earth to warm up by 1 K, we can use the following formula:ΔS = ΔT / αWhere ΔS is the increase in solar constant, ΔT is the increase in temperature, and α is the Earth's albedo (reflectivity).α = 0.30 is the standard value used for the Earth's albedo.ΔS = ΔT / αΔS = 1 K / 0.30ΔS = 3.33 W/m2So, to explain the increase in temperature of 1 K over the last hundred years, the solar constant would need to increase by 3.33 W/m2.

ii) The observed fluctuation of the solar constant over the past 400 years has been around 0.1% to 0.2%. This is much smaller than the 3.33 W/m2 required to explain the increase in temperature of 1 K over the last hundred years. Therefore, it is unlikely that the sun is the main cause of global warming.

The sun cannot explain global warming. While the sun's radiation does contribute to global warming, it is not the main cause. The main cause of global warming is human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, which release large amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

To know more about global warming :

brainly.com/question/29625243

#SPJ11

a) D2022 = $1.9975, D2023 = $2.27715, D2024 = $2.60554, D2025 = $2.98868, D2026 = $3.43243

b) Po = $13.63

c) Dividend yield = 13.85%, Capital gains yield = 74.52%, Expected total return = 88.37%. Dividend yield = 17.89%, Capital gains yield = -23.29%, Expected total return = -5.40%.

a) Dividend is the distribution of earnings to shareholders. Expected dividend for each year can be calculated as follows:

D2022 = D0 (1 + g) = $1.75 (1 + 0.14) = $1.9975

D2023 = D2022 (1 + g) = $1.9975 (1 + 0.14) = $2.27715

D2024 = D2023 (1 + g) = $2.27715 (1 + 0.14) = $2.6055415

D2025 = D2024 (1 + g) = $2.6055415 (1 + 0.14) = $2.98868161

D2026 = D2025 (1 + g) = $2.98868161 (1 + 0.14) = $3.432429195

b) The present value of dividends expected in 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026 can be calculated using the following formula:

PVD = D / (1 + r)t

where

PVD = present value of dividends expected

D = dividend expected in a future year

t = number of years from now

r = required rate of return

PVD2022 = $1.9975 / (1 + 0.12)¹ = $1.77700934579

PVD2023 = $2.27715 / (1 + 0.12)² = $1.88843867485

PVD2024 = $2.6055415 / (1 + 0.12)³ = $1.99719364693

PVD2025 = $2.98868161 / (1 + 0.12)⁴ = $2.10928913223

PVD2026 = ($3.432429195 + ($3.432429195 * 1.05)) / (1 + 0.12)⁵ = $2.25661605368

The present value of the stock price that should exist at the end of 2026 can be calculated using the constant growth equation:

Po = D1 / (r - g)

where

Po = price of stock today

D1 = dividend expected at the end of 2026r = required rate of return

g = expected growth rate

Po = $3.60484320761

Total present value of all dividends expected plus the present value of the stock price at the end of 2026 can be calculated using the formula:

Total PV = PVD2022 + PVD2023 + PVD2024 + PVD2025 + PVD2026 + PoTotal PV = $1.77700934579 + $1.88843867485 + $1.99719364693 + $2.10928913223 + $2.25661605368 + $3.60484320761 = $13.6333900619

The value of the stock today, Po, is $13.63.

Learn more about stock price from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/18366763

#SPJ11

The less electronegative element is more likely to receive the unpaired electron.

A Lewis Structure is a very simplified representation of the valence shell electrons in a molecule. It is used to show how the electrons are arranged around individual atoms in a molecule. Electrons are shown as "dots" or for bonding electrons as a line between the two atoms.

A free radical can be defined as an atom or molecule containing one or more unpaired electrons in valency shell or outer orbit and is capable of independent existence.

An electron, in an atomic orbital, for which there is no other electron in the same orbital but with opposite spin; a characteristic of free radicals and other reactive species.

Electronegativity is a chemical property that describes the tendency of an atom or a functional group to attract electrons toward itself.

A more electronegative element is more likely to be surrounded by more electrons and fulfill its octet. A less electronegative element is more likely to have the electron deficiency, in this case the unpaired electron.

Know more about the electronegative element visit the link

https://brainly.com/question/24977425

#SPJ4

Answer:

Because it’s imposible

Answer:

v = 17.30 m / s

Explanation:

For this exercise we will use Newton's second law

at the bottom of the loop and stopped

           ∑ F = 0

           N-W = 0

           N = W

            W = 770 N

the mass of the body is

            W = mg

             m = W / g

            m = 770 / 9.8

            m = 78.6 kg

on top of the loop and moving

           ∑ F = m a

           N + W = m a

note that the three vectors go in the same vertical direction down

the centripetal acceleration is

           a = v² / r

we substitute

           N + W = m v² / r

           v = \(\sqrt{(N+W) \frac{r}{m} }\)

let's calculate

          v = \(\sqrt{ (350+770) \frac{21}{78.6} }\)

          v = 17.30 m / s

Answer:

A combinational logic circuit is a circuit whose outputs only depend on the current state of its inputs. In mathematical terms, the each output is a function of the inputs. These functions can be described using logic expressions, but is most often (at least initially) using truth tables.

If a 60 Newton-second impulse is given to an object, the change in momentum  is 60 kg-m/s.

In physics, the term "impulse" is used to characterize or measure the impact of force operating gradually to alter an object's motion. It is often stated in Newton-seconds or kilograms per second and is denoted by the symbol J.

Impulse of force is = force applied × time interval = change in momentum.

Mass of the object is =  10 kg

Applied impulse is = 60 Newton-second.

Hence,  change in momentum is = 60 kg-m/s, if a 60 Newton-second impulse is given to an object,

Learn more about impulse here:

https://brainly.com/question/30466819

#SPJ1

By Using Euler's method with two steps, we can find the approximate value of Y(2) is 2.125. , where Y is the solution of the initial value problem dy/dx = x - y, and Y(1) = 3.

Euler's method is defined as a numerical technique which is  used to approximate solutions into ordinary differential equations. The method includes dividing the interval of interest into smaller steps and thereafter approximating the solution at each step by using the derivative of the function.

In this case, we are given the initial value problem dy/dx = x - y, with the initial condition Y(1) = 3. To approximate Y(2) using Euler's method with two steps, we will divide the interval [1, 2] into two equal steps.

Step 1:

We start with the initial condition Y(1) = 3. Using the differential equation dy/dx = x - y, we can approximate the value of Y at the midpoint of the interval [1, 2].

Using the step size h = (2 - 1) / 2 = 0.5, we can calculate Y(1.5) as follows:

Y(1.5) ≈ Y(1) + h × (x - y) = 3 + 0.5 × (1.5 - 3) = 3 + 0.5 × (-1.5) = 2.25

Step 2:

Now, using the value of Y(1.5) as the new approximation, we calculate Y(2) using the same process:

Y(2) ≈ Y(1.5) + h × (x - y) = 2.25 + 0.5 × (2 - 2.25) = 2.25 + 0.5 × (-0.25) = 2.125

Thus,  by using Euler's method with two steps, the approximate value of Y(2) is 2.125.

To know more about Euler's method here

https://brainly.com/question/32513127

#SPJ4

The complete question is

Use Euler's Method With Two Steps To Approximate Y(2), Where Y Is The Solution Of The Initial Value Problem: Dy : X − Y, Y(1) = 3